I don't understand elections or voting, but it looks like @markwarner is hopefully going to lose
gillespieinstantunoff calculator:
http://glenbradford.com/files/Stocks/gillespieinstantrunoff.xlsx
tldr don't trust google election results..
making edits on the fly here to explain.
update 1
Right now the statistics are: and i'll time stampe this.. 9:55pm CST
48.84% Mark warner with 1037231 votes in
48.68% Ed Gillespie with 1033809 votes in
2.48% Robert Sarvis with 52666 votes in
98.59% reporting
update 2:
assuming we get into runoff, and runoff is explained in this video:
//www.youtube.com/embed/wqblOq8BmgM
so as long as warner does not get over 50%, which at this rate it looks like he wont... in theory, this should go to runoff and the Libertarin votes should end up going to Ed Gillespie.
http://www.texastribune.org/2010/07/02/do-libertarians-help-democrats-hurt-republicans/
i strongly hope that he does not get re-elected for the harm he has caused in annoying me and wasting my time with his Crappo bill
1052600
1041638 10962
52890 0.20726
31926 0.60363
20964
Related Posts
- tim howard's notes it will be done within a timeframe that will prevent a possible Republican President/Senate in 2016
- @brinks civil asset forfeiture @irsnews Brinks travels around with lots of cash
- I happen to believe the “sweep” is an unconstitutional taking without due process of law -
- "I recently tried to refinance my mortgage and I was unsuccessful in doing so." - Ben Bernanke
- Nomination For Favorite Article of 2014 - @WSJ Godzilla Defeats the Thing
