30
Rules
3
Pillars
8
Books Written
Investing
Lessons paid for in real dollars
Never recommend something you don't own.
Early in my career I watched analysts on TV pump stocks they had zero personal exposure to. When those stocks cratered, they moved on to the next ticker without consequence. Meanwhile, real people lost real money following their advice. I decided then: if I'm going to tell someone to buy something, I better own it myself. My entire net worth is in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac junior preferred shares — the same securities I write about publicly. Skin in the game is the only credibility that matters.
Being early and being wrong feel exactly the same. Budget for it.
I was early on Fannie and Freddie preferred shares by years. Years. During that time, people called me delusional. My portfolio was underwater. Friends stopped asking about my investments. But being early on a correct thesis and being flat-out wrong are emotionally identical — the only difference is time. You have to structure your life so you can survive being early. That means no margin, no leverage you can't service, and enough cash to pay your bills while the market catches up to reality. If you can't afford to be early, you can't afford to be right.
The best investment thesis fits on one napkin. If it doesn't, you don't understand it yet.
I've written hundreds of articles on Seeking Alpha. The ones that resonated most were the ones I could summarize in two sentences. My Fannie Mae thesis fits on a napkin: the government took over two profitable companies, swept all their profits, and one day a court or Congress will fix it. If you need a 40-page slide deck to explain why something is undervalued, you're either wrong or you're selling something. Complexity is usually a warning sign, not a sign of sophistication.
Do your own due diligence. 'Someone smart said so' is not a thesis.
I lost a significant amount of money in Chinese reverse-merger stocks. Why? Because someone smart recommended them. I didn't dig into the filings myself. I didn't verify the revenue. I trusted a name instead of doing the work. When those companies turned out to be frauds, the 'smart person' shrugged it off. I couldn't. That experience burned into me forever: nobody cares about your money as much as you do. Read the 10-K yourself. Call the company. Visit the factory if you can. Trust, but verify — and lean hard on the verify.
At the supermarket, 50% off draws a stampede. At the stock market, 50% off is a bomb threat. Be the one shopping during bomb threats.
This is the single most important behavioral observation in investing. People are wired to love sales on consumer goods but panic when stocks go on sale. I've watched rational adults sprint toward a Black Friday TV deal, then sell their entire portfolio at a loss because the market dropped 20%. The math is identical — you're getting more value for less money — but the psychology is completely inverted. Every major purchase I've made was during a period of maximum pessimism. Not because I'm brave, but because that's when the prices are right.
Write down why you bought something before you buy it. Read it when you want to sell.
Emotions corrupt memory. When a stock drops 30%, your brain rewrites history: 'I always had doubts.' No, you didn't. You were excited. You saw the value. You did the math. I started writing down my thesis before every purchase — date, price, why I'm buying, what would need to change for me to sell. When the urge to panic-sell hits, I re-read that document. Nine times out of ten, nothing in the thesis has changed. Only the price has changed. And price is not thesis.
Conviction is earned through work, not wishful thinking.
There's a difference between conviction and stubbornness. Conviction comes from reading every filing, understanding every legal angle, knowing the counterarguments better than the bears do. Stubbornness comes from wanting to be right. I've seen people hold positions out of ego, refusing to update their thesis when new information arrives. Real conviction means you've done the work and you can articulate exactly why the consensus is wrong. If you can't steelman the bear case, you don't have conviction — you have hope.
The market doesn't care about your feelings, your thesis, or your mortgage. Respect that.
The market is a machine. It processes information, liquidity, and emotion without any regard for your personal situation. I've watched my portfolio decline for months while being completely right on the fundamentals. The market wasn't wrong. It just didn't care about my timeline. You have to separate your emotional needs from your investment strategy. The market owes you nothing. Not a return, not a timeline, not vindication. Plan accordingly.
If you can't explain it to a bartender, you can't explain it to a judge. And sometimes you need to explain it to a judge.
I've written legal briefs. I've communicated with shareholders, lawyers, and regulators about the Fannie and Freddie situation. The moments that landed were never the complex legal arguments — they were the simple ones. 'The government took their money.' That's it. Five words. If your investment thesis requires a law degree to understand, it will be hard to get other people on your side. And in situations like Fannie and Freddie, getting people on your side — judges, legislators, the public — is the entire game.
The biggest returns come from positions you hold long enough to feel stupid.
Every great investment I've made had a period where I felt like an idiot for owning it. Yellow Media — felt stupid for months before it worked. Fannie preferred — felt stupid for years. The discomfort is the price of admission. If a position were comfortable to hold, everyone would hold it, and it wouldn't be mispriced. The mispricing exists precisely because it's painful to own. You get paid for enduring what others can't. That's the entire value investing model in one sentence.
Building
Ship fast, fix later, never stop
Ship it before you're ready. You'll never be ready.
glenbradford.com launched with broken links, missing images, and placeholder text on half the pages. I shipped it anyway. Within a week, people were reading it. Within a month, it was getting organic search traffic. If I'd waited until it was 'ready,' it still wouldn't exist. Every day you spend polishing is a day you're not learning from real users. The world doesn't reward perfection — it rewards presence. Be present first, perfect later.
Done is better than perfect. Shipped is better than planned. Deployed is better than discussed.
I have a graveyard of 'perfect' projects that never launched. Designs I obsessed over. Architectures I debated for weeks. Meanwhile, the things that actually worked — Delivery Hub, my personal site with 3,143 pages — were all shipped ugly and fixed in production. There's a hierarchy of value: an idea in your head is worth nothing. A plan on paper is worth a little. Code that's deployed and serving users is worth everything. Skip to the end of that hierarchy as fast as possible.
Build the ugly version first. Make it beautiful second. Most projects die at 'planning the beautiful version.'
I've watched talented developers spend months designing the perfect UI before writing a single line of business logic. The project always dies. Beauty is a trap when it comes before function. Build the thing that works — even if it's ugly, even if the CSS is inline, even if the buttons are default browser gray. Once it works, you have something to polish. Before it works, you have nothing but a Figma file and a dream.
Nine features in parallel is not reckless. Nine features in parallel with no tests is reckless.
People told me I was crazy for building voting systems, blog engines, billionaire profiles, and gear comparisons all at the same time. But I wasn't reckless — each feature had its own boundaries. The difference between moving fast and being reckless is whether you can verify things still work. Tests, type checking, and clear boundaries let you move at speed without the whole thing collapsing. Speed without structure is chaos. Speed with structure is just speed.
The best way to learn a technology is to build something embarrassing with it.
I learned Next.js by building a 3,000-page personal website about billionaires, books, and blueberry juice. It's absurd. It's also the most effective learning experience I've ever had. Tutorials teach you syntax. Building something real — something you care about, something embarrassing in its ambition — teaches you how the technology actually works when things go wrong. And things always go wrong.
If you're not embarrassed by the first version, you launched too late.
Reid Hoffman said this, but I felt it before I read it. The first version of every project I've shipped made me cringe. But cringing means you shipped. Not cringing means you're still in your IDE, tweaking padding values while your competitor is getting users. Embarrassment is the admission fee for market feedback, and market feedback is the only feedback that matters.
Automate the boring stuff. Agonize over the interesting stuff. Never confuse the two.
I spent days agonizing over the perfect deployment pipeline. That was stupid — deployment is boring infrastructure. Meanwhile, I was copy-pasting content by hand when I should have been writing scripts. The lesson: know which problems deserve your creative energy and which ones deserve a bash script. Creative problems get your brain. Repetitive problems get automated. The moment you catch yourself doing something manually for the third time, stop and write the automation.
3,143 pages beats a perfectly planned 10-page website that never launches.
People have asked me why my site has so many pages. Some of them are rough. Some need editing. Some are weird. But Google indexes them. People find them. They generate traffic and conversations and connections. Meanwhile, I know a dozen people who've been 'planning' their website for years. Planning is a form of procrastination disguised as productivity. Volume beats perfection because volume teaches you what actually works.
Your users don't care about your architecture. They care if it works.
I once spent a week refactoring code that no user would ever see or benefit from. It made the codebase 'cleaner' but added zero value for the people visiting the site. Nobody has ever said, 'Wow, this website must use a really elegant state management pattern.' They say, 'This loads fast' or 'I found what I needed.' Architecture matters for maintainability, but never at the expense of shipping features users actually want.
The fastest way to finish a project is to start it. Right now. Today. Not Monday.
I have never once successfully started a project 'on Monday.' Monday is where ambition goes to die. Every successful thing I've built started in the middle of something else — a random Tuesday at 11pm, a Saturday morning before my daughter woke up, a lunch break where I wrote the first 50 lines. Momentum is everything. The first commit is the hardest commit. Everything after that is just showing up.
Life
Nutty Bars, rockets, and blueberry juice
Be the person your dog thinks you are. If you don't have a dog, get one.
My dog doesn't care about my portfolio. Doesn't care about my Seeking Alpha stats. Doesn't know what a preferred share is. She just thinks I'm the greatest person alive because I exist and occasionally throw a ball. That unconditional regard is the most honest mirror you'll ever find. On my worst investing days, she still greeted me at the door like I was a hero. Try to deserve that greeting. It's a higher bar than any financial metric.
Launch rockets with your daughter. Real ones. The stomp kind. Every single day she'll let you.
My daughter Maddie and I have a tradition: stomp rockets in the front yard. You put a foam rocket on a tube, jump on the launcher, and watch it fly. It takes 30 seconds. She laughs every time. One day she won't want to launch rockets with her dad anymore. I know this. Every parent knows this. So every day she says 'Rockets, Daddy?' the answer is yes. Always yes. The inbox can wait. The code can wait. The market is closed anyway.
Say 'yes' to things that scare you, 'no' to things that bore you, and 'maybe later' to nothing.
I moved to Miami not knowing anyone. I started kiteboarding at 35. I wrote my first Seeking Alpha article not knowing if anyone would read it (they did — 80,000 people). Every good thing in my life came from saying yes to something that scared me. And every waste of time came from saying yes to something that bored me out of obligation. 'Maybe later' is the most dangerous phrase in English. It's a polite way of saying 'never' while pretending you might. Just decide.
The best things I've built were done while people told me not to. The worst things I've built were done because people told me to.
Every major win in my life was met with skepticism. Writing 8 books? 'Nobody reads books anymore.' Going all-in on Fannie preferred? 'That's insane.' Building a 3,000-page personal website? 'Why?' But the projects I took on because someone else thought it was a good idea — those consistently disappointed. Not because the ideas were bad, but because borrowed motivation doesn't survive the hard parts. And every project has hard parts. You need your own fuel.
Eat the Nutty Bar. Life is short and the chocolate-wafer ratio is perfect.
This is not a metaphor. Nutty Bars are perfect. The layers of chocolate and peanut butter wafer are engineered for maximum joy per calorie. But it is also a metaphor: don't defer every small pleasure for some imagined future where you'll 'deserve' it. You deserve it now. Eat the Nutty Bar. Drink the good coffee. Use the nice plates. The future is not promised, and the Nutty Bar is right there.
Write 8 books about something you believe in. Or 1 book. Or a tweet. Just don't keep it inside.
I've written 8 books. Some sold well. Some didn't. But every single one of them changed me more than it changed any reader. The act of writing forces you to clarify what you actually believe. Half my opinions dissolved the moment I tried to defend them in print. Writing is thinking made visible. It doesn't matter if it's a book or a tweet or a journal entry — get your ideas out of your head and into the world. They'll either survive contact with reality or they won't, and either outcome is valuable.
Call your sister. Send the personalized blanket. It matters more than you think.
I sent my sister a personalized blanket with family photos on it. Cost maybe forty bucks. She cried. Not because of the blanket — because of what it meant. Someone was thinking about her. That's the whole game with relationships: showing people they exist in your mind when they're not in front of you. A random Tuesday phone call. A dumb gift that shows you were paying attention. These small gestures compound into deep bonds. Investing in people works exactly like investing in markets — consistency over time beats grand gestures.
Drink the expensive blueberry juice. Small daily luxuries compound into a good life.
I buy the fancy blueberry juice. It costs more than the generic stuff. But every morning when I drink it, I feel like I'm treating myself well. That feeling compounds. Small daily luxuries — the good coffee, the nice pen, the blueberry juice — they add up to a life that feels intentional rather than deprived. You don't need a yacht. You need a few things every day that make you think, 'This is good.' Find those things and stop apologizing for them.
You are not your portfolio. You are not your job title. You are the sum of your decisions and the stories you tell about them.
After losing a significant amount of money in Chinese fraud stocks, I had an identity crisis. I had tied my self-worth to my returns. When the returns disappeared, so did my sense of self. It took years to understand: you are not a number on a screen. You are the person who gets up after a loss. The person who writes about the failure honestly. The person who keeps going. Your portfolio is a tool. Your job is a role. Your identity is the narrative you construct from your choices, especially the hard ones.
Take it or leave it. But take it.
This is the shortest rule and the hardest to follow. It means: stop deliberating. Stop weighing pros and cons for the fifteenth time. Stop asking for one more opinion. If you've done the work and the opportunity is in front of you, take it. Regret from action fades. Regret from inaction compounds. I have never once regretted taking a shot. I have often regretted waiting for a better one that never came.
Rules I Broke (And What Happened)
Honest stories of when I didn't follow my own advice
The Chinese Fraud Stock Disaster
Rule violated: “Do your own due diligence.”
I bought into several Chinese reverse-merger stocks because a respected analyst recommended them. I read his writeup, nodded along, and bought without ever reading the actual SEC filings myself. When the companies turned out to be fraudulent — fabricated revenue, phantom factories, the whole playbook — I lost a staggering amount of money. The analyst moved on to his next pick. I was left holding worthless shares and a very expensive lesson. The rule 'Do your own due diligence' was written in the ashes of that experience. Now I read every filing, every footnote, every exhibit. Trust no one's homework but your own.
The Perfect Website That Never Launched
Rule violated: “Ship it before you're ready.”
Before glenbradford.com, I tried to build a 'perfect' portfolio site. Custom design system. Pixel-perfect Figma mockups. A bespoke CMS. I spent three months on it and never shipped a single page to production. Meanwhile, a friend launched a janky WordPress site and was getting traffic within a week. When I finally adopted the 'ship ugly, fix live' approach, I went from zero to 3,143 pages in a fraction of the time I'd wasted on the perfect version. That dead project taught me that perfection is procrastination wearing a tuxedo.
When I Sold Too Early Out of Impatience
Rule violated: “The biggest returns come from positions you hold long enough to feel stupid.”
There was a position — I won't name it, but it haunts me — where I did all the work. I had the thesis. I had conviction. And then it dropped, and kept dropping, and I sold because I was tired of feeling stupid. Within eighteen months, it recovered and then some. I had the right idea, the right security, and the right thesis — but I didn't have the patience. The returns went to someone who could tolerate the discomfort longer than I could. Now when I feel the urge to sell, I re-read my original thesis document. If nothing has changed except the price, I stay.
Recommending Something I Didn't Own (Once)
Rule violated: “Never recommend something you don't own.”
Early in my Seeking Alpha career, I wrote about a stock I found interesting but hadn't actually purchased yet. I figured I'd buy it after publishing. The article got traction, the stock moved, and suddenly I was chasing my own recommendation at a higher price. Worse, when it later declined, readers were upset and I had no skin in the game to share their pain. The hypocrisy of it bothered me for months. From that day forward, the rule became absolute: I own it before I recommend it. Period. No exceptions. No 'I plan to buy it.' Ownership first, then advocacy.
Rules From the Legends
Great investors think alike — here's the proof
Warren Buffett
“Be fearful when others are greedy, and greedy when others are fearful.”
How this connects:This is the intellectual foundation of 'Be the one shopping during bomb threats.' Buffett understood that crowd psychology creates mispricing. When everyone is running for the exits, the prices are best. When everyone is celebrating, the prices are worst. It sounds simple. Living it is the hardest thing in investing.
Charlie Munger
“It is remarkable how much long-term advantage people like us have gotten by trying to be consistently not stupid, instead of trying to be very intelligent.”
How this connects:Munger's insight maps to several of my rules: do your own due diligence, write down your thesis, don't confuse conviction with stubbornness. The goal isn't brilliance — it's avoiding catastrophic errors. If you can avoid the big mistakes, the compounding takes care of the rest. Most investing damage is self-inflicted.
George Soros
“It's not whether you're right or wrong that's important, but how much money you make when you're right and how much you lose when you're wrong.”
How this connects:This is the asymmetry principle. My rule about budgeting for being early is really about this: structure your positions so that being wrong costs you manageable pain, but being right delivers life-changing returns. The Fannie preferred thesis is exactly this kind of asymmetric bet — limited downside with enormous upside if the thesis plays out.
Peter Lynch
“Know what you own, and know why you own it.”
How this connects:Lynch's simplest rule is also his most powerful, and it maps directly to 'Write down why you bought something before you buy it.' Most investors can't articulate their thesis for a position they currently hold. That should terrify them. If you don't know why you own something, you won't know when to sell it — or when to buy more.
Seth Klarman
“Value investing is at its core the marriage of a contrarian streak and a calculator.”
How this connects:Klarman captures the two ingredients you need: the emotional ability to disagree with the crowd and the analytical rigor to verify your thesis with numbers. My rule about conviction being earned through work speaks to the calculator half. My rule about shopping during bomb threats speaks to the contrarian half. You need both. One without the other is either cowardice or recklessness.
Howard Marks
“You can't predict. You can prepare.”
How this connects:This connects to 'The market doesn't care about your feelings, your thesis, or your mortgage.' Marks understood that the future is unknowable, so the intelligent response isn't prediction — it's preparation. Structure your portfolio to survive the scenarios you can't predict. Own things with margin of safety. Have a plan for when you're wrong. Preparation beats prediction every single time.
The Anti-Rules
Common investing “rules” I disagree with — and why
Diversification is protection against ignorance, as Buffett said. If you've done the work — really done it, hundreds of hours of research on a single thesis — concentration is the rational choice. My entire portfolio is in Fannie and Freddie preferred shares. People call this insane. I call it the logical conclusion of deep conviction. Diversification makes sense if you don't have an edge. If you do have an edge, spreading your bets dilutes it. Know the difference.
This sounds reasonable until you realize it guarantees mediocrity. If you only invest 'play money,' you'll never build meaningful wealth. The uncomfortable truth is that every great investor at some point made a concentrated bet that, if wrong, would have hurt badly. The key isn't limiting your exposure to comfortable levels — it's doing enough work that your conviction justifies the exposure. Comfort and wealth creation are rarely in the same room.
This rule treats price movement as information about value. It's not. A stock dropping 10% tells you that sellers outnumbered buyers today. It tells you nothing about the underlying business. If your thesis was sound at $10, it's even more sound at $9. Automatic stop-losses are a gift to market makers and a tax on investors who mistake volatility for risk. The only reason to sell is if the thesis is broken — not because the price moved against you.
This is excellent advice for most people. I disagree with it for a specific reason: it assumes you have no informational edge. If you've spent years studying a specific sector, a specific legal case, a specific set of securities — you might actually know something the market doesn't. Index funds are the right choice for passive investors. But if you've done the work to develop genuine expertise, putting that expertise to work in a concentrated position can deliver returns that index funds never will. The caveat is that almost everyone overestimates their edge. Be honest about yours.
Rules are guidelines, not laws.
I break half of these regularly. That's fine. The point isn't perfection — it's having something to come back to when you're lost. A compass, not a cage.
Frequently Asked Questions
Q: What are Glen Bradford's investing rules?
Glen has 10 investing rules distilled from over 15 years of active investing, including: never recommend something you don't own, being early and being wrong feel exactly the same, the best thesis fits on one napkin, and the biggest returns come from positions you hold long enough to feel stupid. These rules come from real experiences — losing a significant amount in Chinese fraud stocks, hitting a home run in Yellow Media, and going all-in on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac preferred shares.
Q: What is the #1 rule of investing?
Glen's #1 investing rule is 'Never recommend something you don't own.' He practices this by having his entire net worth invested in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac junior preferred shares — the same securities he writes about publicly. Skin in the game is the only credibility that matters. If someone recommends a stock but doesn't own it, that tells you everything you need to know about their conviction.
Q: Why does Glen Bradford concentrate his portfolio instead of diversifying?
Glen believes diversification is protection against ignorance. When you've done hundreds of hours of research on a single thesis and developed genuine conviction, concentration is the logical result. He has studied the Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac situation for years, written hundreds of articles about it, and concluded that the risk-reward asymmetry justifies full concentration. He acknowledges this approach isn't for everyone — it requires deep expertise and the emotional resilience to endure extended periods of being early.
Q: How do Glen's rules compare to Warren Buffett's investing principles?
There is significant overlap. Glen's rule about shopping during bomb threats mirrors Buffett's 'Be fearful when others are greedy, greedy when others are fearful.' His emphasis on understanding what you own echoes Peter Lynch. His contrarian streak aligns with Seth Klarman. The key difference is that Glen's rules come from a retail investor's perspective — someone without billions in capital who has to manage real-life consequences alongside portfolio decisions.
Q: What are Glen's rules for building software and startups?
Glen has 10 building rules centered on one theme: ship fast, fix live. Key principles include 'Done is better than perfect,' 'Build the ugly version first,' and '3,143 pages beats a perfectly planned 10-page website that never launches.' These rules come from building Delivery Hub (a Salesforce project management tool) and glenbradford.com (a 3,000+ page personal site). The core belief is that volume and velocity beat perfection and planning.
Q: What is the most important life lesson Glen Bradford has learned?
Glen's most important life lesson is that you are not your portfolio or your job title — you are the sum of your decisions and the stories you tell about them. After losing a significant amount of money in fraudulent stocks, Glen had an identity crisis that forced him to separate self-worth from net worth. The experience taught him that resilience, honesty about failure, and the willingness to keep going matter far more than any single financial outcome.
Get Glen's Musings
Occasional thoughts on AI, Claude, investing, and building things. Free. No spam.
Unsubscribe anytime. I respect your inbox more than Congress respects property rights.
Join the Community
Weekly deep-dive analysis, real-time position updates, and direct access to Glen Bradford. $20/month.
Learn moreKeep Exploring
Lessons From Losing
7 expensive lessons I paid full price for. The stories behind the rules.
Read moreCobra Kai Philosophy
Strike First. Strike Hard. No Mercy. The dojo version of these rules.
Read moreThe Win Wall
Every good thing that's happened. Proof the rules work (sometimes).
Read moreDataTrading Analysis — The Receipts
4 years of trades. See the rules in action (and where I broke them).
Read moreMy Worst Trades
The losses behind the rules. Pain meter included.
Read moreAct As If
The book where I wrote these rules down for the first time.
Read more