$FNMA #FANNIEGATE
In an Amicus Brief filed this week, the Cato Institute and Southeastern Legal Foundation tell the Federal Circuit that the decision in Piszel v. U.S. represents an unwarranted expansion of the government's power to interfere with private contracts, and encourage the court to reconsider its decision. A copy of the Amicus Brief is attached to this e-mail message as well as Appearances entered by Andrew Buttaro, Esq., and W. Scott Hastings, Esq., at Locke Lord LLP, and David G. Cabrales, Esq., and Lucas C. Wohlford, Esq., at Gardere Wynne Sewell LLP, representing Cato and SLF. 15-5100-0072 15-5100-0073 15-5100-0074 15-5100-0075 15-5100-0071
Enjoyed this? Get more like it.
Glen's Musings — AI, investing, and building things. Occasional. Free.
Glen Bradford
Investor · Builder · Writer
MBA from Purdue. Former hedge fund manager. Holds 26 series of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac junior preferred stock. Built Cloud Nimbus for Salesforce consulting. Author of Act As If. Writes about investing, building things, and the longest financial fraud in American history.
More in Fanniegate
Keep Exploring
Fanniegate Timeline & Evidence
The full timeline, 8 books, and the current status of recapitalization.
Read moreCurrent Positions
26 series of junior preferred stock across Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.
Read moreFannie & Freddie Privatization Guide
Timeline, recap plan, and what privatization means for preferred and common shareholders.
Read moreScreenplayFANNIEGATE: The Hero Movie
One guy from Indiana who bet everything on Fannie Mae and wouldn't shut up. Full screenplay.
Read moreDisclaimer: This blog post reflects the author's personal opinions at the time of writing and is not financial, investment, or legal advice. Glen Bradford holds positions in securities discussed on this site. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Do your own research and consult qualified professionals before making investment decisions. Some content on this site was generated or edited with AI assistance.