$FNMA @CGASPARINO EDITED 3/4/15 6am
EDIT:
Don't forget that according to the whitehouses' own website Fannie and Freddie are private companies:
http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/omb/budget/fy2016/assets/gov.pdf
"They are not included in the Federal Budget because they are private companies,"
As a housing GSE, Fannie Mae is a federally chartered, shareholder-owned, private company with a public mission to provide stability in and to increase the liquidity of the residential mortgage market and to help increase the availability of mortgage credit to low- and moderate-income families and in underserved areas
//END OF EDIT//
Hey, just watched your segment on Fannie and Freddie with Dick Bove.
Loved it! Absolutely fabulous coverage.
Now, I realize that some of the questions and answers weren't the best exchanges in the world, but overall, I think that this sort of coverage is fantastic.
Wanted to say that your perspective on why would Obama ever want to give private shareholders a dime is fair and reasonable, I mean why would he?
Well, my answer is this, it's great to keep for a piggy bank for himself, but does he want to hand that over to a republican president? It's my understanding that this charade will continue for as long as it benefits him and the political winds are shifting especially as this becomes more public, aka 228 > 187.5 which involves an amendment between two government agencies that their own acting director says trumps the law
https://www.youtube.com/embed/Wa_4WW_BrZA
so, the law trumping agreement between two government agencies is currently being litigated in the court of claims, which adjudicates government takings claims.
give it time, but there is a multi prong resolution here:
-
either congress releases via new legislation
-
either (not the president) but the secretary of the US treasury lew sends notice to fhfa / fnma / fmcc terminating the agreement on a court ruling
-
president calls melvin watt
lots of ways this can work out, but here's the kicker... either this stays government owned, a government agency, and $5T goes on the government's balance sheet... OR this becomes privately owned again.
in the privately owned situation where they just IPO an entirely new company, who do you think will want to own it if the previous owners just got $0 after their shareholder rights got expropriated by government self dealing?
anyway, the only way for this to continue is to return to private shareholders.
hope this helps!
love your coverage, keep asking great questions. i think you're doing stupendous
Enjoyed this? Get more like it.
Glen's Musings — AI, investing, and building things. Occasional. Free.

Glen Bradford
Investor · Builder · Writer
MBA from Purdue. Former hedge fund manager. Holds 26 series of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac junior preferred stock. Built Cloud Nimbus for Salesforce consulting. Author of Act As If. Writes about investing, building things, and the longest financial fraud in American history.
More in Fanniegate
Keep Exploring
Fanniegate Timeline & Evidence
The full timeline, 8 books, and the current status of recapitalization.
Read moreCurrent Positions
26 series of junior preferred stock across Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.
Read moreFannie & Freddie Privatization Guide
Timeline, recap plan, and what privatization means for preferred and common shareholders.
Read moreScreenplayFANNIEGATE: The Hero Movie
One guy from Indiana who bet everything on Fannie Mae and wouldn't shut up. Full screenplay.
Read moreDisclaimer: This blog post reflects the author's personal opinions at the time of writing and is not financial, investment, or legal advice. Glen Bradford holds positions in securities discussed on this site. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Do your own research and consult qualified professionals before making investment decisions. Some content on this site was generated or edited with AI assistance.