Case Study
I Shipped 825 Commits in 27 Days
I went all-in on Claude Code for a month. Web apps, enterprise platforms, client demos, business automation — all built with AI as my primary development partner. Here's everything that happened.
March 5 – April 1, 2026 · 219 sessions · 170 analyzed by Claude's /insights command
TL;DR
I treated Claude Code as a tireless development team rather than a coding assistant. I'd give broad directives like “build 25 pages” or “ship all these PRs” and let it execute autonomously while I moved to the next thing. 94% of goals were achieved. The other 6% taught me more than the successes did.
The approach is iterative, not spec-driven. Launch fast, review output, course-correct. I rejected work freely and demanded redos. 139 things went wrong across 170 sessions — and throughput still crushed anything I could have done solo.
The Full Breakdown
By the Numbers →
The raw data behind 27 days of AI-assisted development
What Actually Worked →
The workflows that turned Claude Code into a force multiplier
Everything That Broke →
139 friction incidents, full transparency, lessons learned
What's Next →
From pair programming to autonomous development pipelines
How I Actually Use It
I average 6+ sessions per day, often running multiple in parallel. My typical pattern: give a broad directive, let Claude execute, review, course-correct. I rarely write detailed specs upfront — the AI figures out the implementation, and I steer it.
The work spans an unusually wide surface area — full-stack web development, enterprise CRM platforms, client-facing demo sites with cinematic animations, Slack bot integrations, email automation pipelines, and financial content. 825 commits in 27 days means I optimize for throughput over precision, accepting some failures as an acceptable cost of moving fast.
The key insight: AI coding isn't about getting it right the first time. It's about iterating so fast that wrong answers barely cost you anything. A human developer might take 2 hours to build a page. Claude builds it in 3 minutes. Even if I reject it twice and it takes 3 tries, I'm still way ahead.
Favorite Moment
In a mid-March session, I casually asked Claude to build a dedicated tribute page for a friend — complete with an embedded mini-game — just to pull up and surprise him during a live call. Claude built and shipped it in minutes, though two Claude instances fighting over the same git repo caused deployment chaos in the process.
Get Glen’s Updates
Investing insights, new tools, and whatever I’m building this week. Free. No spam.
Unsubscribe anytime. I respect your inbox more than Congress respects property rights.
Keep Exploring
By the Numbers
The raw stats: tool usage, languages, time of day, session types.
Read moreDeep DiveWhat Actually Worked
The 3 workflows that made this worth it.
Read moreDeep DiveEverything That Broke
139 friction points, fully transparent. Lessons included.
Read moreDeep DiveWhat's Next
Where AI-assisted development is heading.
Read more