Rop V. FHFA
FHFA and Treasury oppose the Rop Plaintiffs’ request to amend their complaint, and copies of their filings explaining their reasons are attached to this e-mail message.
Fisher v. U.S.
Judge Sweeney entered her opinion and order this afternoon saying the Federal Circuit’s decision in Fairholme is binding precedent compelling dismissal of the Fisher & Reid Plaintiffs’ complaint. A copy…
Fisher v. U.S.
In an order entered today, Judge Sweeney directs the Fisher & Reid Plaintiffs to file a redacted version of their second amended complaint filed in Mar. 2018 by Fri., Sept.…
Kelly v. U.S.
The Kelly Plaintiffs proposed filing a sur-reply last week, to further argue two points. In an order entered Friday, Judge Sweeney denise the request because she doesn’t think the government’s…
Fisher v. U.S.
In the filing attached to this e-mail message, the government tells Judge Sweeney the Tyler decision isn’t helpful to the Fisher and Reid Plaintiffs.
Fannie/Freddie Consolidated Class Action
shareholders explain why holders of Fannie Mae securities are entitled to prejudgment interest under Delaware law.
Fannie/Freddie Consolidated Class Action
In the motion attached to this e-mail message, FHFA, Fannie and Freddie tell Judge Lamberth why he should deny any prejudgment interest to Fannie Mae shareholders under Delaware law.
Fannie/Freddie Consolidated Class Action
Copies of the jury’s second note to Judge Lamberth and the completed verdict form are attached to this e-mail message.
Fannie/Freddie Consolidated Class Action
A printed copy of the instructions Judge Lamberth gave the jury is attached to this e-mail message. Copies of the parties’ exhibit lists are also attached. Further, the jury sent…
Rop v. FHFA
The Rop Plaintiffs filed their request to file an amended complaint today, and a copy of that request is attached to this e-mail message.