Fanniegate Headquarters

shareholders explain why holders of Fannie Mae securities are entitled to prejudgment interest under Delaware law. 

In the motion attached to this e-mail message, FHFA, Fannie and Freddie tell Judge Lamberth why he should deny any prejudgment interest to Fannie Mae shareholders under Delaware law. 

Copies of the jury’s second note to Judge Lamberth and the completed verdict form are attached to this e-mail message. 

A printed copy of the instructions Judge Lamberth gave the jury is attached to this e-mail message.  Copies of the parties’ exhibit lists are also attached.  Further, the jury sent…

The Rop Plaintiffs filed their request to file an amended complaint today, and a copy of that request is attached to this e-mail message. 

Judge Lamberth’s courtroom deputy made a notation on the docket say the trial resumed today and will continue at 10:00 a.m. Monday morning.  The parties submitted a collection of video…

FHFA, Fannie and Freddie have more to say about what the jury heard during Mr. Satriano’s testimony in the reply attached to this e-mail message. 

Shareholders submitted a reply in support of their request to modify the verdict form, and a copy of that filing is attached to this e-mail message. 

Shareholders filed two documents today:     — Doc. 351 urges Judge Lamberth to tell the jury any comments he makes from the bench should not viewed as favoring one…

Judge Lamberth’s courtroom deputy made a notation on the docket relating the jury heard testimony from Don Layton (by video deposition) and received live testimony from Dr. Mukarram Attari today. …