Fisher v. U.S.
In a filing delivered to Judge Sweeney today, the government explains why the Fisher and Reid Plaintiffs’ proposed course of action is misguided and it urges Her Honor to dismiss…
In a filing delivered to Judge Sweeney today, the government explains why the Fisher and Reid Plaintiffs’ proposed course of action is misguided and it urges Her Honor to dismiss…
The parties delivered nine documents to Judge Lamberth this past week discussing what the jury should see and hear during the second trial. Five are sealed and unavailable to the…
Judge Lamberth entered an opinion and an order today denying the requests concerning supplemental expert reports, telling the jury about reliance damages, and a jury questionnaire. Copies of the opinion…
Judge Lamberth approved the two-week extension to file papers concerning Dr. Mason’s testimony the parties requested last week, and a copy of that order is attached to this e-mail message.
The government filed its motion to dismiss and a copy of that filing is attached to this e-mail message.
FHFA filed two the Class Plaintiffs filed four motions last night asking Judge Lamberth to make pre-trial rulings about what the jury will and won’t see and hear in the…
The Bhatti Plaintiffs filed their reply brief yesterday and a copy’s attached to this e-mail message.
The parties sought and obtained a two-week extension to propose changes to the jury instructions and verdict form. That change doesn’t delay the start of the second trial on Mon.,…
The Rop Plaintiffs a reply to the High Court, and a copy of that filing is attached to this e-mail message.
In the reply attached to this e-mail message, Berkley explains to Judge Lamberth why the jury in the second trial should be allowed to hear testimony about expectancy damages.