FHFA filed a cross-motion for summary judgment on the Collins Plaintiffs’ constitutional claim and a memorandum in opposition to the Collins Plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment on that claim and in support of its cross-motion. Copies of those filings are attached to this e-mail message. FHFA argues that its structure comports with established precedent and is entirely constitutional. Moreover, FHFA says, even if FHFA were unconstitutional, the Third Amendment would still stand.
16-cv-03113-0035 16-cv-03113-0036
