Fairholme responded to Mr. SDammon’s appeal earlier this week, the Clerk released a copy of Fairholme’s brief this morning, and a copy is attached to this e-mail message. Fairholme makes it clear that it does not challenge (and has no intention of challenging) the U.S. Court of Federal Claims’ jurisdiction to consider its takings claim and urges the Federal Ciruit to affirm Judge Sweeney’s order denying Mr. Sammons’ motion to intervene.17-1015-0021
Mr. Sammons filed a reply brief last month that, it appears, I neglected to share earlier. A copy’s attached to this e-mail message.17-1015-0019