In an Amicus Brief filed this week, the Cato Institute and Southeastern Legal Foundation tell the Federal Circuit that the decision in Piszel v. U.S. represents an unwarranted expansion of the government’s power to interfere with private contracts, and encourage the court to reconsider its decision. A copy of the Amicus Brief is attached to this e-mail message as well as Appearances entered by Andrew Buttaro, Esq., and W. Scott Hastings, Esq., at Locke Lord LLP, and David G. Cabrales, Esq., and Lucas C. Wohlford, Esq., at Gardere Wynne Sewell LLP, representing Cato and SLF. 15-5100-0072 15-5100-0073 15-5100-0074 15-5100-0075 15-5100-0071
