Fairholme, Arrowood and the Class Plaintiffs tell Judge Lamberth there’s no reason to reconsider his Sept. 28, opinion because FHFA is advancing “a misguided attempt to rehash old arguments and relitigate issues that th[e] Court has completely and correctly decided.” Importantly, the shareholder-plaintiffs tell Judge Lamberth, FHFA hasn’t brought anything new before the court; FHFA repeats what it’s already argued without success. The shareholder-plaintiffs urge Judge Lamberth to reject FHFA’s ” last-ditch attempt to relitigate a theory that this Court already considered and rejected.” A copy of today’s filing is attached to this e-mail message.13-mc-01288-0091
