$FNMA #FANNIEGATE
PwC delivered its Response opposing remand of the Edwards Plaintiffs' lawsuit to state court, and a copy of that filing (excluding Exhibits A through Q, which are copies of 1996 through 2007 Offering Circulars) is attached to this e-mail message. PwC argues that federal court is the right place for this lawsuit because federal law controls. Besides, PwC adds, GSE shareholders have no rights since FHFA stepped into their shoes. PwC suggests that Judge Moreno doesn't need to read anything other than HERA to dispose of the remand request.16-cv-21224-0037
Deloitte opposes remanding the Edwards Plaintiffs' lawsuit to state court, and a copy of that filing is attached to this e-mail message. Federal law is controlling, Deloitte says, and urges Judge Scola to rule on FHFA's substitution request before considering the shareholders' remand request.16-cv-21221-0040
Enjoyed this? Get more like it.
Glen's Musings — AI, investing, and building things. Occasional. Free.
Related Posts
Keep Exploring
Fanniegate Timeline & Evidence
The full timeline, 8 books, and the current status of recapitalization.
Read moreScreenplayFANNIEGATE: The Movie
The full screenplay — $7 trillion, 17 years, dramatized.
Read moreScreenplayFANNIEGATE: The Hero Movie
One guy from Indiana who bet everything and wouldn't shut up about it.
Read moreCurrent Positions
26 series of junior preferred stock across Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.
Read moreDisclaimer: This blog post reflects the author's personal opinions at the time of writing and is not financial, investment, or legal advice. Glen Bradford holds positions in securities discussed on this site. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Do your own research and consult qualified professionals before making investment decisions. Some content on this site was generated or edited with AI assistance.