Month: February 2016

The Saxton Plaintiffs’ lead lawyer in Iowa filed a Motion for leave with withdraw his appearance in Fairholme v. U.S. today, and a copy of that filing is attached to…

15-00109-0029 Ms. Robinson filed her Combined Response (Doc. 30) to FHFA and Treasury’s Motions to Dismiss this afternoon.  We can’t see Ms. Robinson’s Response because her lawyers provisionally filed the…

16-02107-0003 16-02107-0002 Roberts v. FHFA has been assigned to the Honorable Edmond E. Chang and Magistrate Judge Maria Valdez.  Judge Chang is 45, and served as an Assistant U.S. attorney for…

13-465-0297 Fiarholme filed a redacted version of its Reply in support of its Motion to Compel this morning, and a copy is attached to this e-mail message. Although the Government’s Response…

Under seal, the Saxton Plaintiffs filed their Amended Complaint in the Northern District of Iowa yesterday.  Shortly thereafter, Chief Judge Reade denied FHFA and Treasury’s Motions to Dismiss the original…

16-02107-0001 A new lawsuit challenging the Net Worth Sweep was filed in the Northern District of Illinois earlier today, and a copy of the complaint initiating that case is attached…

13-465-0295 13-465-0294 13-465-0296   Public versions of the Government’s Notice of Apparent Violation, Fairholme’s Response, and the Government’s Reply (Docs. 285, 286 and 290) are attached to this e-mail message.

13-465-0293 Washington Federal wants Judge Sweeney to contract the near-one-year timetable outlined in the Joint Status Report presented by Fairholme and the Government on Jan. 28.  Washington Federal suggests that…

13-465-0292 Judge Sweeney released a copy of her sealed Order (Doc. 287) dated Jan. 26, 2016, this afternoon, and a copy is attached to this e-mail message. So now we…

Get ready to be confused. The Government filed a Reply (Doc. 291) today, under seal, in Fairholme v. U.S.  The docket entry says it’s a Reply to a Response (Doc.…